Connex rival had near-perfect year
* Clay Lucas
* April 2, 2009
HONG Kong train operator MTR — which will submit on Tuesday its bid to run Melbourne's train system for the next 15 years — ran 99.9 per cent of its trains within two minutes of their scheduled time last year.
MTR (Mass Transit Railway) is 76 per cent owned by the Hong Kong Government and runs one of the world's most modern metro systems.
It also has one of the world's most successful smartcard ticketing systems, the Octopus card.
It is impossible to compare Melbourne's train system, largely laid out in the late 19th century, to Hong Kong's system, started in 1975 with two lines and since expanded to nine.
The 211-kilometre system carries 3.4 million passengers each weekday. Melbourne's 372-kilometre system carries about 350,000 each weekday.
The French-owned Connex — which will next week also hand in its bid for the contract to the Government, along with another French transport giant, Keolis — this week released its worst performance results for late trains.
Connex, which operates the system on trains and tracks owned by the Government, ran about 6000 out of 55,000 trains late in March.
"Late" in Melbourne is any train running more than six minutes behind schedule. In Hong Kong, two minutes is considered late. Under Melbourne's new contracts, five minutes will be considered late.
Connex and MTR are no strangers. Stockholm Council in Sweden this year booted out Connex's parent company, Veolia, and replaced it with MTR to run its metro.
The council chose MTR because it offered a higher-quality service, not the cheapest price. Veolia is now suing Stockholm Council because its bid was cheaper.
The bid process to decide who wins the lucrative contract to run Melbourne's trains has been highly secretive.
Bidders have been gagged, and bid documents were to be confidential — until they were obtained by the Opposition and handed to the media.
Public Transport Minister Lynne Kosky yesterday defended the level of confidentiality surrounding the bids.
"The Government wants to achieve the best possible outcome for the people of Melbourne," her spokesman said. "That includes refraining from commenting on details of the bids and bidding companies while the selection process is under way."
Opposition transport spokesman Terry Mulder said compared to international best practice, Melbourne was a joke. "The punctuality of trains in Melbourne is poor. In country Victoria, it is abysmal," he said.
Now of course, lol Connex Suk.
I think the key thing here is that Stockholm ditched Connex because they were shit, and then picked up MTR.
Melbourne should do the same, that way the sad sack frenchies at Veolia can try and sue the Vic State Government.
Whatever happens, hopefully Connex gets the flick - and whilst doing so, the contract is specified in such a way that Victoria has to lump a shitload of cash (HEY WHY DON'T WE DROP THE MyKI SYSTEM LIKE ITS HOT AND SAVE A BUCK THERE) into modernising our aging network.
April 1 2009, 22:54:48 UTC 3 years ago
the way this sentence was formed made me snicker. "oop, here you go"
April 1 2009, 22:59:03 UTC 3 years ago
April 1 2009, 23:01:58 UTC 3 years ago
THEY ARE DOING IT WRONG!
Honestly, Myki has to be a corrupt black op's thing - they could have simply just picked up the UK's Oyster Card or HK's Octopus Card, as is - then dumped it around Victoria for less.
YES, LETS RE-INVENT THE WHEEL FUCKERS, BUT LETS DO IT STUPID LIKE FIRST...
April 7 2009, 09:29:22 UTC 3 years ago
April 2 2009, 01:00:54 UTC 3 years ago
April 2 2009, 01:03:48 UTC 3 years ago
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/st
And it is so far costing over a billion dollars.
April 1 2009, 23:20:24 UTC 3 years ago Edited: April 1 2009, 23:22:20 UTC
Edit: Not to mention how you can blip it through your wallet and your bag. And buy Maccas and 7-11 with it. Glee!
As for Stockholm's trains - they are a city of about 1 million and yet their trains are so much more efficient and frequently run. I've never had to wait more than five minutes for a train over there.
April 1 2009, 23:51:28 UTC 3 years ago
April 1 2009, 23:57:01 UTC 3 years ago
April 1 2009, 23:35:49 UTC 3 years ago
April 2 2009, 00:52:59 UTC 3 years ago
Where's common sense?
Can anyone explain me how arrival within 5 minutes of scheduled time can be considered as in time arrival? Hello?! Hello?!April 2 2009, 01:24:42 UTC 3 years ago
Re: Where's common sense?
I love how we seem to be able to redefine things these days. It simply blows me away. Seems that their criteria seems to shift as well so they never have to pay anyone out. Useless, useless, uselessApril 2 2009, 09:28:13 UTC 3 years ago
Re: Where's common sense?
Well, a train is currently only considered late after 6 minutes! And if you look at the Connex punctuality figures... imagine how much worse it would have been if it was 5.3 years ago
April 2 2009, 05:07:21 UTC 3 years ago
Australian politics makes me hate life at times.
April 2 2009, 05:09:45 UTC 3 years ago
The Victorian Government are the ones that own the tracks, etc.
April 2 2009, 10:17:46 UTC 3 years ago
April 2 2009, 06:49:06 UTC 3 years ago
Also Melbourne is very expensive, its cost me 35c in perth, there its $1.47 for the same distance.
April 7 2009, 09:33:56 UTC 3 years ago
(Too expensive - I think that if the State government is serious about either environmental sustainability or about reducing road congestion, they ned to make PT cheap enough that the price doesn't factor into people's decision not to use it over cars.)
April 7 2009, 09:34:55 UTC 3 years ago
April 2 2009, 07:02:15 UTC 3 years ago
A new operator would be nice, with higher standards of service.
A new Govt. or at least a new Minister who would channel funds more appropriately would also be very nice.
April 2 2009, 07:21:08 UTC 3 years ago
April 2 2009, 07:27:31 UTC 3 years ago
MTR having a 99.9% on-time performance rating means fuck all when you consider the massive MASSIVE infrastructure differences – wait, the entire CITY DENSITY differences between Melbourne and fucking Hong Kong. fucking hell.
April 2 2009, 07:48:18 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
Anonymous
3 years ago
April 2 2009, 07:49:26 UTC 3 years ago
April 2 2009, 07:58:05 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago